How AI Transforms Productivity & Global Economy
AI's swift advancement promises a future with heightened productivity, economic growth, and improved living standards globally. However, concerns loom over potential job losses and widening inequality. How hard will AI hit us and what should we brace ourselves for?
Generative AI's Impact on Productivity: A Slow Burn with Promising Potential
While investment in generative AI has surged, its tangible effects on productivity remain limited. Economist Joseph Briggs of Goldman Sachs Research attributes this to the technology's slow adoption rate, stating:
"Until we’ve seen more significant uptake in the actual application of AI, in the regular work production process, I don’t think that we’re going to see as big of an impact on productivity.”
However, early signs remain optimistic. Studies indicate an average 25% productivity increase following AI adoption, bolstering the outlook for potential gains.
Briggs highlights the complex infrastructure required for widespread AI deployment, including powerful models, robust query handling capabilities, and significant investments in semiconductors, network capacity, and power infrastructure. These developments are underway, with semiconductor revenues up 50% and AI hardware providers seeing a $250 billion increase in forecasts.
Briggs notes that many CEOs anticipate a significant impact from generative AI in the three-to-ten-year horizon, rather than the immediate future. As a result, currently only 5% of companies report using generative AI, primarily in information services, finance, insurance, and the motion picture industry. Marketing, automation, chatbots, speech-to-text, and data analysis are the dominant use cases.
The labor market has seen minimal impact so far, with unemployment rates between AI-exposed and less-exposed occupations remaining consistent. AI-attributed layoffs account for less than 0.1% of total job separations. In fact, AI has likely spurred a net increase in employment, with a rise in job postings seeking AI skills.
While the full impact of generative AI on productivity and the labor market remains to be seen, the current landscape points towards a gradual but transformative shift in the years to come.
AI's Productivity Promise: A Latent Impact with Historical Parallels
The transformative potential of AI as a productivity booster is widely recognized, but its tangible impact on country-level data remains latent. This delayed effect isn't unexpected, mirroring historical patterns seen with revolutionary technologies like electricity and computers, where significant productivity gains took decades to materialize.
The absence of immediate AI-driven productivity gains isn't surprising. History teaches us that even the most transformative technologies require time to fully integrate and optimize processes. Parallels can be drawn with the productivity booms associated with electricity and computers, which occurred roughly 20 years after their introduction and peaked when around half of businesses had adopted the technology.
The initial adoption of new technology often leads to a temporary decline in productivity, attributed to changes in production methods and investments in human capital. This "J-curve effect" suggests that productivity will eventually surge significantly after the initial dip.
AI's accessibility, requiring minimal infrastructure investment, points to a potentially faster impact on productivity compared to earlier technologies. However, the J-curve effect still applies, and substantial gains might take years to manifest.
The 1990s productivity boom in the US was preceded by a surge in private investment in information processing equipment and software. A similar investment trend in AI-related technologies is likely necessary to trigger a significant macro-level productivity boost. While some positive signs exist, a broader investment boom remains elusive.
Though company-level studies showcase significant productivity gains with AI adoption (2-3 percentage points), macro-level gains might be tempered by factors like cybersecurity risks, political disruptions, and energy constraints.
Considering various offsetting influences, the net AI-driven productivity increase is likely to hover around 1 percentage point, similar to the impact of personal computers and the internet. Negative factors like population aging and declining productivity gains from earlier innovations could further limit the overall impact.
The US, with a larger ICT sector and greater AI investment compared to Europe, is positioned to experience faster and more substantial productivity gains. Initially, these gains will likely concentrate in the technology-producing sector, later spreading across the broader economy. Countries producing AI technology, however, will likely maintain a productivity advantage.
Europe faces additional challenges, including a less developed risk capital market, language diversity, stricter data protection regulations, and anticipated regulatory pressures. These factors could further limit AI's productivity impact in the region.
In conclusion, AI's full impact on country-level productivity is still unfolding. While its transformative potential is undeniable, historical patterns suggest a delayed effect. Patience and strategic investment are key to unlocking AI's full productivity benefits and ensuring a prosperous future.
AI's Impact on Jobs: An IMF Analysis
A new IMF study highlights that while AI is likely to complement human work in many cases, roughly 40% of global employment is vulnerable. Unlike previous technological shifts, AI's impact will be felt across skill levels, particularly affecting high-skilled jobs in advanced economies.
In advanced economies, approximately 60% of jobs might be affected by AI, with half potentially seeing increased productivity. The other half could face reduced labor demand, lower wages, or even job losses due to AI taking over key tasks.
Emerging and low-income countries show lower immediate disruption risks, with 40% and 26% of jobs exposed, respectively. However, the lack of infrastructure and skilled workforce in many of these nations could hinder their ability to benefit from AI, potentially widening global inequality.
Addressing Inequality
AI's influence could exacerbate income and wealth inequality within countries. Workers effectively leveraging AI could see higher productivity and wages, while others fall behind. Younger workers might adapt more easily, leaving older workers struggling.
Overall, AI is likely to worsen inequality, necessitating proactive policy measures like strong social safety nets and retraining programs for vulnerable workers.
An Inclusive AI-Driven World: IMF's AI Preparedness Index
The rapid business integration of AI underscores the urgent need for policy action. The IMF's AI Preparedness Index aids countries in formulating effective policies by assessing readiness in areas like digital infrastructure, human capital, labor market policies, innovation, economic integration, regulation, and ethics.
The index reveals that wealthier economies are generally better prepared for AI adoption than low-income countries. Singapore, the United States, and Denmark lead the index due to their strengths across all evaluated categories.
Based on these insights, advanced economies should focus on AI innovation, integration, and robust regulation, fostering trust and a safe AI environment. Emerging and developing economies need to prioritize foundational investments in digital infrastructure and a digitally skilled workforce.
The AI era demands our attention. With thoughtful policymaking, we can ensure it benefits everyone.
Want to make AI work for you?